August 15, 2022

IS the journey of the Lord Advocate to the Supreme Court docket a idiot’s errand? If the no-consequence referendum she advocates goes by way of, it is going to be boycotted by those that can not put up with the troubles of one other marketing campaign and vote. Most of us did not wish to vote in 2014, however we fought for what was proper and we gained. The Nationalist facet has by no means accepted this outcome as a result of they imagine the Scots have made a horrible mistake and needs to be given the prospect – or compelled – to vote once more and do it proper this time.

However hearts have been hardened by the continuing nationalist agitation, and pro-British Scots will not play the SNP recreation. The results of this shall be a continuation of the present stalemate. Some commentators argue that the impasse have to be overcome, however why? We are able to go on with out a vote, and the foaming separatists can go on foaming. It will not do them any good, and it’d even damage some in the event that they overheat.

The issue with the SNP is that it has no motive to go away the UK. All he has is “we may very well be like Denmark,” which was ridiculed by Nicola Sturgeon’s financial adviser, Professor Mark Blyth. And in addition to, it has a “have a look at our assets”, having no thought tips on how to use and monetize these assets. Judging by the best way the SNP boasts of our “assets”, one would possibly suppose that no different nation had the assets – not to mention England.

The stalemate is essentially as a consequence of the truth that the SNP has no arguments with the Scots, which clearly reveals that Scotland can be higher off outdoors the UK. That is clearly not the case and most Scots are both conscious of it or suspect that it might be so.

Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh.

THE DANGER OF CHOICE DENIAL

TOM Gordon (“Sturgeon’s court docket case is the start of her lengthy goodbye,” The Herald, July 28) could also be proper that the Supreme Court docket will rule that the 24-year-old language of the Scotland Act provides Westminster full management of Scotland. Sure, it might be the present First Minister’s swansong (I believed she needed to go earlier than the 2021 elections to reset her occasion), however the brand new chief of the SNP, confronted with no alternative however a “muscular union motion”, in a closed and imperialist Britain, could develop into extra overtly “nationalist” of their campaigns: elevating moderately than reducing expectations.

This brings us to a severe level that Mr Gordon doesn’t increase: Ciarán Martin’s comment that “the official place of the UK authorities appears to be that there is no such thing as a authorized or democratic approach to obtain Scottish independence”. When the poll field is not related to the democratic change that half the inhabitants is hoping for, then different, darker strategies could emerge, and in Scotland we do not have to look far for proof of this (traditionally, for a similar motive, London is a conscientious objector). For God’s sake, let’s have a well-liked referendum and get it over with, as a result of the following one will certainly be the final.

G. R. Weir, Ochiltree.

GIVE US A MORE PLEASANT OPTION

NOT being somebody who agrees with Adam Tomkins on many factors, I’ve to say that this week he hit the Tories straight on the mark (“Truss shall be a puppet prime minister pulled by the strings of loopy outcasts”, The Herald, July 27 ).

I’ve lengthy believed that Scotland is in higher management of its personal future, and I’m starting to surprise how a lot worse issues should get earlier than even essentially the most ardent unionists come to their senses. One doesn’t should be a member of the SNP to see the virtues of this excellent nation plowing its personal furrow whereas remaining a geographical a part of the British Isles, however not topic to anyone a part of it.

The phrase “independence” now has such conflicting connotations that it’s vital to supply “center of the highway” to folks like me a extra acceptable choice, given the whole disillusionment with the blinkered London-centric system. The present association merely reaffirms the raison d’etre of the SNP and won’t disappear by way of a failure to grasp the simple benefits and aspirations of Scotland.

The place to begin have to be the popularity that the present relationship just isn’t working and there may be no future in a match and authoritarian UK authorities stubbornly sustaining the established order.

Ann Shackleton, Kirkcudbright.

LET THE DISCUSSION BE ATTENTIVE

GUY Stenhouse writes: “The SNP is so petty that the lure of any deal that does not contain the British is irresistible” (“The SNP line ‘democracy deficit’ is for the terminally silly,” The Herald, July 27).

I am not a very supporter of the SNP, however what a load of nonsense that borders on virtually a touch of racism. What’s “unhappy, actually” is that he thinks that, he is the one one who thinks that, I am positive.

Within the final paragraph, he writes: “We should perceive that the British are literally our associates and that Britain just isn’t so unhealthy.” Nicely the English are positively OUR associates and Britain is so unhealthy in the meanwhile.

I am sorry, Mr. Stenhouse, however I hope that the upcoming debates, conversations and discussions about independence shall be held at a a lot larger stage of civility, frequent sense and motive than this.

George Archibald, West Linton.

CASE FOR UNION IN CRISIS

TWO politicians who Scotland didn’t vote for however who’ve held excessive public workplace are competing to inform us that the federal government they served has led the UK into a number of crises. They’re reporting dwell on TV that electrical energy payments are doubling, inflation is at its highest stage in 40 years, taxes are highest in 70 years, industrial unrest, development is sluggish and a few of our hospitals are falling aside, one in King’s Lynn is standing nonetheless. on piles. .

Now about this irrefutable argument for the Union?

Alan Carmichael, Glasgow.

Dismissal will hang-out labor

The choice to fireplace Shadow Transport Minister Sam Terry for remaining true to his ideas and beliefs and becoming a member of rail staff at their picket line (“Scottish commerce unionist quits over picket line dismissal,” Heraldscotland, July 28) may be seen as a second when Sir Keir Starmer snatched defeat from the jaws of eventual victory and gave respite to the warring excursions. A lot of unions condemned Mr. Terry’s dismissal, and Sharon Graham, chief of Unite the Union, is correct to say Labor is “turning into increasingly irrelevant to abnormal staff.”

This breathtaking personal aim will hang-out the Labor Get together and assist it to defeat the final election now that Sir Keir has proven himself in his true blues.

Ruth Marr, Sterling.

• The headline of a letter from Denis Bruce (July 28) referred to “…the pernicious assaults of the Tories on the unions.” The actually vital anti-union motion comes not from the Conservative Get together, however from the very occasion that the unions themselves created, the Labor Get together of Nice Britain. When a right-wing coup inside the Labor Get together might result in a purge of “socialists” and the punishment of shadow ministers who’ve the temerity to publicly assist putting staff, the query arises of who’s pulling the strings and why.

Prefer it or not, if you must go to work on daily basis to place meals on the desk, you are a employee, whether or not you are a neurosurgeon or stacking grocery store cabinets. We dwell in an period the place the proportion of GDP that goes to wage labor has fallen by 10%, the place the wealthy have gotten even richer, whereas the remaining have suffered for many years from deliberate austerity insurance policies. We’re at the moment in a interval of inflation and monetary professional Martin Lewis is predicting a doable mass refusal to pay outrageously elevated utility payments until there’s some type of authorities intervention.

I ponder if the Labor Get together is popping its again on these of us who should work to outlive, who’re going to take care of the pursuits of the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants, for the reason that Conservative Get together has clearly gained. not this manner?

David J. Crawford, Glasgow.

GIVE US A NEEDED OPTION

JOHN McNab’s proposal (Letters, July 26) to introduce obligatory voting is attention-grabbing and I agree with it if there’s an “I abstain” field that I may give up on. Higher but, name it the “I would not vote for anybody on this occasion” field and watch the stampede to the polls.

My outdated dad as soon as instructed me that you just should not vote for the occasion you suppose will do essentially the most good, it’s best to vote for the occasion you suppose will do the least hurt.

Smart man, my dad.

James Gracie, Sanquhar.

Learn extra: We should resist Tory assaults on unions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.